FACS logo ¡¡

Federation of Asian Chemical Societies (FACS)


  Last updated on 13 June, 2001      

¡¡ ¡¡
FACS Home
About FACS
FACS Projects
Meetings & Events
Member Societies
Membership
FACS Newsletter
FACS Awards
Phone Book
Links
Your comments to FACS
FACS Newsletter 1/2000

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY IN MALAYSIA WITH SPECIAL
REFERENCE TO PALM-BASED INDUSTRY
 

Choo Yuen May
Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia (PORIM)
P. O. Box 10620, 50720 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
¡¡

ABSTRACT

Introduction
Malaysian has transformed from a commodity-based economy into a manufacturing-based economy in the past two decades. This transformation can be attributed to macroeconomic and structural adjustment policies and strategies undertaken by the Government in the mid-eighties, which significantly contributed to major inflow of foreign direct investments (FDIs) and the rapid growth of the manufacturing sector. The first Industrial Master Plan (IMP), 1986-1995 has laid the foundation for the growth of the manufacturing sector. Such rapid growth of the manufacturing sector will have to be sustained in the next decade in order to attain the objective of becoming a fully developed industrialised nation by the year 2020.

The successful growth and transformation of the economy requires the nation to address the challenge of efficient and optimal utilisation of existing resources in order to address the challenge of efficient and optimal utilisation of existing resources in order to sustain and further improve the national competitiveness. The rapid changes in the global trading and investment environment necessitates the enhancement of the competitiveness and resilience of the manufacturing sector. The second Industrial Master Plan (IMP2), 1996-2005 thus focuses on increasing competitiveness through strengthening industrial linkages, both forward and backward, enhancing value-added activities, and increasing the productivity of the manufacturing sector (1).

The Manufacturing Sector
The growth of the manufacturing sector began in the sixties and accelerated with the introduction of the Investment Incentives Act, 1968 and the promotion of free zones (FZs) in 1971. Since the industrialisation drive in the 19670s, the manufacturing sector has overtaken the agriculture sector as the engine of growth of the economy. In view of its size and strong links with the other sectors of the economy, the manufacturing sector is and will continue to be the major engine of growth for the Malaysian economy. Thus the manufacturing sector, considered to be the backbone of the Malaysian economy, contributed 34% towards the gross domestic product (GDP), 27% of the total employment and 83% of total export earnings in 1998 (Table 1). It will have a significant bearing on macroeconomic performance of the economy.

Table 1: Major Indicators of the Manufacturing Sector, 1995-1998

Indicator

1995

1996

1997

1998

Manufacturing Value Added (RM million, in 1978 prices)

39,790

44,684

50,270

45,155

Annual Growth Rate(%)

14.2

12.3

12.5

-10.2

Share to GDP(%)

33.1

34.2

35.7

34.4

Share to Total Exports(%)

79.6

80.5

81.0

82.9

Share to Total Employment(%)

25.7

26.4

27.1

27.0

Employment Growth(%)

8.5

7.7

7.6

-3.6

Source£ºEconomic Planning Unit Prime Minister's Department. 
Mid-Term Review of the Seventh Malaysia Plan 1996-2000

Broadly speaking, the manufacturing sector can be classified into resource and non-resource-based industries. Being part of the manufacturing sector, the resource-based chemical industry plays an important role in revitalising and sustaining the long-term growth of the economy. In 1998, the resource-based contributed about 51% of the total manufacturing output. The resource-based industries include chemical and chemical products, food manufacturing, wood and wood based products, rubber products, non-metallic mineral products and non-ferrous metal industries (Figure 1). However, resource-based industries expanded 6.1% compared to only 2.6% for the non-resource-based industries in 1998. Among the resource-based industries the growth is uneven, for example, the output of the non-ferrous metal at 11% per year, the chemical and chemical products at 10% per year and the rubber products at 8% per year are significantly higher than the others (Table 2).

Figure 1: Share of Manufacturing Output by Industries 1998

Source: Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister's Department, Malaysia. 
Mid-Term Review of the Severth Malaysia Plam 1996-2000

Table 2 : Manufacturing Output, 1995 and 1998

Industry

 

RM¡¯Mil
1995

 

RM¡¯Mil
1998

AverageAnnual
GrowthRate
1996-1998
(%)

Resource-Based

19,168

22,906

6.1

Food Manufacturing

3,400

3,842

4.2

Buverages Industries

488

497

0.6

Tobacco Manufacturing

447

529

5.8

Wood & Wood Products

2,200

2,210

0.2

Chemical & Other Chemicals

5,666

7,591

10.2

Petroleum Refineries

597

673

4.1

Rubber Products

3,192

4,021

8.0

Non-Metalie Mineral Products

2,911

3,176

2.9

Non-Ferrous Metal

267

367

11.2

 

 

 

 

Non-Resource-Based

20,622

22,249

2.6

Testiles & Clothing

2,557

2,639

1.1

Iron & Steel Basic Industries

1,377

1,156

(5.7)

Fabricated Metal Products

2,863

3,275

4.6

Electrical & Electronic Products

11,992

13,889

5.0

Transport Equipment

1,674

1,120

(12.5)

Others

159

170

2.2

Total

39,790

45,155

4.3

Source: Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister's Department, Malaysia. 
Mid-Term Review of the Severth Malaysia Plam 1996-2000

Of the resource-based industries, the wood and wood-based products, plastic fabricated products and rubber products (mainly gloves) are export-oriented industries. The contribution of these to the share of gross manufactured exports is still relatively small at 14% compared with the non-resource-based sector. However, there is a clear trend of notable increase in the exports of chemical and chemical products, rubber gloves and condoms, wood and wood-products in the past four years. Overall the manufacturing sector taken as a whole is the leading source of foreign earnings for the country. The share of the manufactured exports to total exports was high and continued to increase from 80% in 1995 to 83% in 1998. This reflects the success of the export-driven industrialisation strategy prusued by the Malaysian government.

Chemical Industry In Malaysia
This can broadly be classified into the following categories:
1.Petroleum products and natural gas 
2.Chemicals and chemical products

  • petrochemical
  • agricultural chemetic : pesticides, fertilisers
  • soap, detergent, cosmetic and toiletry preparations
  • inorganic chemicals
  • pharmaceutical
  • industrial gases
  • paint and paint products
  • oleochemicals

3.Plastics products
4.Rubber products

Resource-Based Chemical Industry With Special Reference To Palm-Based Industry
The oil palm fruit produces two types of oil, palm oil from the mesocarp and palm kernel oil from the nut, the endosperm. They are chemically different and have between them practically the entire range of long, medium and short chain fatty acids.

The Malaysia production of crude palm oil in 1998 was about 8.3 million tonnes, together with 1.1 million tonnes of crude palm kernel oil. About 80% of the palm oil found its way into food products, leaving about 20% for non-food applications. The two main non-food uses are in the manufacture of oleochemicals and soaps.

Oleochemicals

Oleochemicals refer to chemicals obtained from palm oil and palm kernel oil; they can be divided into two groups of products, i.e. basic oleochemicals and oleochemical derivatives.

Basic oleochemicals are fatty acids, methyl esters, fatty alcohols, fatty amines and glycerol. They are essentially the building blocks of the oleochemicals industry. From these basic oleochemicals, a very wide range of oleochemical derivatives can be produced. Figure 2 is a flow chart leading from palm oil to basic oleochemicals and their derivatives (2). Since palm oil and palm kermel oil contain between them almost the entire range ot ratty acids, practically all the oleochemicals can be produced from them.

Figure 2. Oleochemicals from palm oil and palm kernel oil

Due to the similarity of the fatty acid composions with palm oil and palm stearin (the soild fraction) resemble that of tallow, while palm kernel oil resembles that of coconut oil (Tables 3 & 4), there is a great possibility for inter-substitution among these fats and oils. Technically, therefore, palm oil and palm stearin could to a large extent replace tallow, and similarly palm kernel oil and coconut oil are inerchangeable materials in oleochemicals manufacturing. In fact, plam oil and plam kernel oil offer the following advatntages:

  • They are renewable resources and their products are more environmentally friendly.
  • They are recognised as vegetable oils and thus their deivatives and applications are fully acceptable to people for whom animal fats may be subjected to religious taboos.
Table 3. Fatty Acid Composition (%) of Palm Oil and Palm Stearin Compared to Tallow

Fatty Acid

Palm Oil

Palm Stearin

Tallow

Dodecanoic C12:0

0.1-1.0

0.1-0.6

0-0.2

Tetradecanoic C14:0

0.9-1.5

1.1-1.9

2-8

Hexadecanoic C16:0

41.8-46.8

47.2-73.8

24-30

Hexadecenoic C16:1

0.1-0.3

0.05-0.2

2-3

Octadecanoic C18:0

4.2-5.1

4.4-5.6

1425

Octadecenoic C18:1

37.3-40.8

15.6-37.0

40-49

Octadeedienoic C18:2

9.1-11.0

3.2-9.8

1-5

Others

0-1

0-1

0-1


Table 4. Fatty Acid Composition (%) of Palm Kernel Oil Compared to Coconut Oil

Fatty Acid

Palm Kernel Oil

Coconut Oil

Hexanoic C6:0

0.1-0.5

0-0.8

Octanoic C8:0

3.4-5.9

2-6

Decanoic C10:0

3.3-4.4

6-10

Dodecanoic C12:0

46.3-51.1

44-52